Program > Papers by speaker > Chen Kong-Pin

Anchoring Effect in Litigation: Empirical Evidence
Kong-Pin Chen  1@  , Yun-Chien Chang  2@  , Chang-Ching Lin  3@  
1 : Academia Sinica
2 : Academia Sinica
3 : Cheng-Kung University

Given its wide acceptance, it is surprising that the empirical, rather than experimental, evidence for anchoring effect is rare and inconclusive. We offer the first large-scale court evidence for anchoring in judicial decision-making. Using Taiwan's court cases on trespassing, matched with transaction data of lands and another dataset on judge experience, we provide evidence that the plaintiff's claim strongly anchors the court's judgment: Both the plaintiff's claim and defendant's counter-claim significantly influence the decisions of the less-experienced judges, but not the more-experienced judges. Therefore, we not only provide evidence for anchoring in litigation, but also suggest experience as a crucial debiaser


Online user: 1 Privacy
Loading...